• Time Out New York
    • Time Out New York Kids
    • Time Out Worldwide
    • Travel
    • Book store
    • Subscribe to Time Out Chicago
    • Subscriber Services
  • Time Out Chicago
  • Ad Space
    (728 x 90)
  • Search
  •  
    • Home
    • Art & Design
    • Books
    • Clubs
    • Comedy
    • Dance
    • Film
    • Gay & Lesbian
    • Home & Living
    • Kids
    • Museums & Culture
    • Music
    • Opera & Classical
    • Restaurants & Bars
    • Sex & Dating
    • Shopping
    • Spas & Gyms
    • Sports & Rec
    • Theater
    • Travel
    • TV
    • RSS
      • TOC blog full feed
      • TOC blog category feeds
      Sections
      • Around Town
        • Freebie of the week
        • Public Eye
      • Art & Design
      • Arts & culture and the economy
      • Books
      • Classical & Opera
      • Clubs
      • Comedy
      • Dance
      • Film
        • Films of 1999 revisited
        • Oscars 2009
        • Sundance 2009
        • Toronto International Film Festival 2009
        • Twilight
      • Gay & Lesbian
      • Internet
      • Jobs
      • Kids
      • Media
        • Radio
      • Miscellaneous
      • Music
        • Blues Fest 2009
        • Lollapalooza 2009
        • Lollaparties
        • Pitchfork Music Fest 2009
        • SXSW 2009
      • Politics
        • Inauguration 2009
      • Promotions
      • Restaurants and bars
        • Dining & Libation Society
        • Eat Out Awards
        • Eat Outings
      • Sex and relationships
      • Shopping and style
        • Fashion Focus
      • Spas, fitness and health
      • Sports & Rec
        • Player to Be Named Later
      • Television
        • Fall 2009 TV
        • TV: 24
        • TV: Battlestar Galactica
        • TV: Top Chef
        • What's on TV Tonight
      • Theater
        • Jeff Awards
        • Steppenwolf Theatre Company
      • Time Out Chicago Kids
      • Travel
      Podcasts
      • Promotions
      • Back of the Book
      • Dining & Libation Society
      • Eat Outings
      • Fall 2009 TV
      • What's on TV Tonight
      • Fashion Focus
      • Lollaparties
      • Music: The Infinite Loop
      • Public Eye
      • Toronto International Film Festival 2009
      • Twilight
      Recent posts
      • Heads Up: World of Chocolate Dec 3
      • What’s on TV Tonight: November 7
      • Five things to do today: November 7
      Time Out Chicago links
      • TOC Twitter stream
      • TOC Flickr group
      • TOC Comedy Facebook group
      • TOC Eat Out crew's delicious page
      • TOC Books' Goodreads page
      Ad Space
      (120 x 240)
      Time Out links
      • Time Out New York Blog
      • TONY Kids Blog
      • Time Out London
    • Tools

      • Print
      • Share this
        • Delicious
        • Digg
        • Facebook
        • reddit
        • StumbleUpon
  • The TOC Blog TOC RSS Feed

  • « Previous Next »

    Taste test: McDonald’s Angus Deluxe, Angus Mushroom and Swiss, Angus Bacon and Cheese

    Posted in Restaurants and bars by John Dugan on July 2nd, 2009 at 2:24 pm
    Angus Deluxe, Photo: Martha Williams

    Angus Deluxe, Photo: Martha Williams

    Americans are bigger than most people on the planet, mainly because we eat too much. We like things large like the Big Mac and our children, by and large, are getting bigger—health conscious media reminds us of these observations again and again. Fast food and convenience stores have tried the healthier options route in recent years, but it turns out, as McDonald’s market research shows, that we actually want an even bigger slightly better burger. Entering locations today, the Angus Deluxe, McDonald’s “third pounder” has a stamp with a big ‘A’ and “100% Angus” printed on the box along with a graphic of two cheery lads playing football.

    angusbacon

    We gathered some staff to taste test the Angus Deluxe ($3.99, with American cheese, sliced red onions and tomatoes, green leaf lettuce, mayo, and pickles) and its sidekicks, the Angus Mushroom & Swiss ($3.99) and the Angus Bacon & Cheese (pictured above, $4.50). We grabbed some Big Macs for comparison’s sake and then hit the tasting laboratory.

    All three burgers are big. The Deluxe weighed 10.8 oz, the Mushroom 9.3 oz and the Bacon 10 oz. As for flavor adn texture, those are subjective matters.

    John Dugan - “I very rarely go to McDonald’s—during my twenties I refused to go inside for anything more than a chocolate shake. But McDonald’s has done a few things right with the Angus if they want to get the premium consumer back in the chain—the toppings are actually pretty fresh looking and tasting—the lettuce is really green and the pickles look enticing. The bun tastes more wholesome than a typical Mickie D’s powder puff. That’s why it is surprising that the straight-up Angus doesn’t have as much beefy flavor or juiciness as one would hope for—instead its been charred to a fairly dry consistency. A few bites of the bacon burger prove it the smokiest of the three—but I suspect that smoke comes in a bottle. Oddly enough, though I can’t stand the canned mushrooms on the mushroom burger, that version has a bit more beef flavor pushing through—perhaps ordering a basic version of the Deluxe might strike a decent flavor balance. And stacked up against the perennial Big Mac—the Angus actually tastes more like a real burger and less like an odd sauce between Wonderbread buns. Still, I’m not swayed enough to try this burger another time when there are “natural” burger joints popping up around the neighborhood.

    Big Mac vs. Angus Deluxe

    Big Mac vs. Angus Deluxe

    Madeline Nusser - “I turn my nose up at badly prepared meat, but somehow I’ve been able to condone my McDonald’s cravings for years. Here’s how I see it: McDonald’s meat is pumped full of so many vegetable-based products and chemicals, that it’s not really meat, it’s a foodstuff. And damn those Bigmacs are good. But the new burgers—angus overly ground to a fine, grisly mixture and cooked until it dies a second death—force me to officially renounce my love for McDonald’s. But in all seriousness, I give it good marks for fresh tomatoes and a nice mushroom/meat combination; bad marks for over-cooked, nearly inedible meat with no variance in texture.”

    Kris Vire - “I can’t remember the last time I ate a McDonald’s burger—their usual lifeless gray patties are just too unappetizing. But the bacon and cheese Angus was surprisingly tasty. Not as juicy as something I’d order at Epic Burger or Patty Burger, but moist and with fresh-seeming toppings, and just the right amount of salt from what struck me as pretty decent bacon. The super-dry sesame seed bun was a buzzkill, though.”

    Leah Johnston - “It’s no Hardee’s. They’ve had an Angus burger for years.”

    Brent DiCrescenzo - “Is there any regulation on using the word Angus? Its got that plywood texture like its been ground-up too fine. It’s a dehydrated Whopper slathered in mayo. McDonald’s beef is particle board to begin with, so thickening the patty doesn’t help. Texturally, it broke down like a meat-flavored sawdust cake with little pearls of gristle. It’s supposed to be ground beef, not powdered. Also, man, I don’t want an uppity hamburger from McDonald’s. Savor your junk food status, Mayor McCheese. Nobody needs a pretentious sandwich, when it’s being pimped by a clown. The mushroom edition tasted alright, but those gummy ’shrooms chewed like Willy Wonka had made them. Or perhaps they’re little bits of Grimace.”

    Frank Sennett - “As a McDonald’s aficionado of long standing, I have to say this tastes a bit too much like a BK Whopper for my taste, although it is drier (like Mickey D’s burgers always are). The flavor of the meat is a cut above what McDonald’s normally wraps up and shoves across the counter at you, though, and I do like the mushroom-and-mayo combo.”

    Carly Mulliken - “It still kind of tastes like McDonalds, but is good.”

    Jake Malooley - “Between the two versions of the Angus Third Pounders I tasted, the Deluxe and the Mushroom & Swiss, the latter’s surprisingly authentic mushroom flavor made it the more memorable burger. (Isn’t it sad that we have to be surprised by authenticity at a restaurant?) The Deluxe, which tasted like a lesser Burger King Whopper, struck me less like a menu item than a cheap shot fired in the fast-food wars. Neither of the burgers, despite the “angus” tag on their boxes, improved much on the typical beef taste we’ve come to know and avoid. If Mickey D’s really wanted people like me to consider eating under the Golden Arches instead of quality beef-between-bun joints like Patty Burger and Epic Burger, the Angus Third Pounder project should’ve been given to their food experts (presuming they have them) and not the marketing department.

    Tags: Angus Bacon and Cheese, Angus Deluxe, Angus Mushroom and Swiss, McDonald's
    • E-mail this to a friend
    • del.icio.us
    • Digg
    • Facebook
    • Google
    • MySpace
    • Yahoo! Buzz
    • TwitThis
    • StumbleUpon
    « Previous: Gender bias in theater: The women in charge react

    » Next: Press Play: Beck digs deeper into the Velvet Underground
    13 comments
    1. Posted by Johnny Le Blanc on July 3rd, 2009 at 8:44 pm

      I tried the deluxe. The burger was extremely dry and had a nasty taste.

    2. Posted by Mike on July 7th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

      Not too much slander going on here? Any proof of the “vegetable-based products and chemicals” comment? Millions of people don’t eat at McDonalds because they have to, but because they genuinely enjoy it. Look at the empire, their HQ in Oakbrook with an executive chef and extensive taste testing panel– they aren’t messing around.

    3. Posted by seriously on July 14th, 2009 at 9:59 am

      Lot of poor generic ‘mcdonalds is terrible’ comments for a review. Why bother reviewing if you’re already predisposed to hating it? Well here’s my review. Angus Deluxe is a decent sandwich. Walked in planning on getting a Big Mac, walked out pleasantly surprised. Will go back for another.

    4. Posted by NYC Nancy on July 25th, 2009 at 9:33 pm

      I like the Angus Deluxe overall.
      But let me backtrack a bit here first: I don’t often eat at fast food places, but Big Macs have always been a guilty pleasure for me that I’ve tended to indulge in two or three times a year. Lately, I’ve been getting the Angus Deluxe (with a small order of fries, which is what I have also always gotten whenever giving in to the occasional Big Mac urge).
      My reason for switching to the Angus Deluxe this past year or so is mainly due to my perception that it might be just a little bit healthier than the Big Mac, and it gives me the same “I just ate a burger and fries” satisfaction the Big Mac always gave me. Whether the Deluxe is lower in fat and/or calories than the Big Mac, I have no idea. But I do find that the presence of the fresh tomato, leaf lettuce, and red onion toppings are rather reassuring to me. And since I’m not eating these things very often, I doubt it’s going to make any real impact in my health either way.
      Anyway, I have to say that the burger in the Deluxe, since it is “well done,” is pretty darn dry. But with the addition of the mayonnaise, pickles, and tomato, the dryness is of the meat is off-set sufficiently to make it an enjoyable burger on the whole. For intense tastiness, it’s still beat out by the Big Mac, but not by too much.

    5. Posted by cress on July 26th, 2009 at 2:26 pm

      Bacon N Cheese was really good. New thick-cut red onions, new crinkle-cut pickles, and friggin McD bacon on one of their burgers? AWESOME..I must be living in upside-down land.

    6. Posted by Vladimir Smirnov on August 1st, 2009 at 11:20 pm

      Just tried this “angus mushroom&swiss” cause it looked and sounded just what I like. And it really could be great if it tasted anything but salt. The amount of salt in that thing is unbelievable. Let alone so much salt in a single burger is not very healthy, it just kills the taste of angus, mushrooms, and swiss altogether. I’d call it “a salty thing with meat, cheese and stuff”. Back to BK, I think, it’s never failed.

    7. Posted by Mike on August 5th, 2009 at 11:58 am

      So, anyways, I just got the mushroom and swiss burger, and to my horror, it was covered in mayo… i hate mayo… McDonald’s usually doesn’t put mayo on their sandwiches… so, i didn’t even think of asking for no mayo… i mean, mayo on a mushroom and swiss burger doesn’t even make sense…

    8. Posted by GDFace on August 6th, 2009 at 9:35 am

      Agree with Vladimir. McDonald’s regularly oversalts its food — I assume to mask the poor quality of its ingredients. And, as everyone has said, the quality of the main ingredient here is so low — dry, finely ground, with no bite whatsoever and made worse by gag-worthy smoke-in-a-bottle. The whole thing seems more like a scientific curiosity than actual food.

    9. Posted by Mike T on August 16th, 2009 at 11:18 am

      Why is McDonald’s going to the trouble to offer a Angus grade burger if the product is delivered below room temp on a semi-stale bun? “Hot, sizzle-seared third-pound patty…”? What a joke!

    10. Posted by Candice on August 21st, 2009 at 10:06 am

      NYC Nancy:

      The perception that the Angus Deluxe is healthier than the Big Mac is entirely in your head. It takes about 10 seconds to retrieve the nutritional information for both sandwiches. The Angus Deluxe is less healthy across the board.

      But when you are comparing a 540 calorie grease ball to a 750 calorie one, it’s splitting hairs, really. And it shouldn’t stop you from enjoying a meal at McDonalds.

    11. Posted by Tauro Sanchez on September 13th, 2009 at 7:27 pm

      This is truly the sandwich from hell. I have had the courtesy to try this meal twice, and both times I have fallen ill with an absurdly painful stomach. Now that I’ve seen this side-by-side with the Big Mac, I can’t help but wonder what I was thinking; it should be a crime to eat this much fast food- especially a sandwich with this quality of nutritional value. The Mushroom & Swiss combo is one of my favorites, but this burger has indefinately turned me off fast food.

    12. Posted by babooy69 on September 23rd, 2009 at 11:32 pm

      Mushroom and Swiss with absolutely no taste except the mushrooms and whatever seasoning they used to to spruce them up. Angus fried on a grill, leaves no flavor of beef, only the guilty shame of eating the whole grease filled bomb, because $3.99+tax is too much to waste and hunger demands something to eat. Call this burger the ‘bulimics special.’ I know this is in bad taste, but 6 hours later I can’t get the horror out of my mind. I needed to vent so I came here and see what others are saying about the new Angus.

    13. Posted by babooy69 on October 25th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

      One month later the ill feeling I had in my gullet after consuming this tasteless grease bomb still lingers. Every time I see one of Micky Dee’s truck and trailer combos drive by with the nauseating rolling trailer billboard my stomach begins to heave and the sarcastic name McDonald’s new “1/3 LB ANUS BURGER” comes to mind.

    Leave a comment
    Required
    Required (will not appear on site)


    The TOC Blog is for both our writers and readers to talk about what's going on in Chicago. We hope you'll take the opportunity to comment on posts here, with the following caveats:

    • Comments here are moderated. We reserve the right to delete any comments we find offensive, potentially libelous, or just plain nasty. In other cases, we may just edit them.
    • Commenters who frequently post offensive, libelous or nasty comments run the risk of being banned from commenting.
    • Comments are often posted by those using fake names or those who wish to remain anonymous. So take all comments here with a grain of salt. Or an entire salt lick, in some cases.

    If you have any questions about this policy, please e-mail John Dugan, our Web Editor, at jdugan@timeoutchicago.com.



      • Subscribe now and save 87%!
      • For just $19.99 a year, you'll get hundreds of listings and free events each week, plus our special issues and guides, including Cheap Eats, Great Spas, Fall Preview, Holiday Gift Guide and more!
      • Time Out Covers
      • Time Out Chicago respects your privacy. We will only use your e-mail address in order to contact you regarding to your subscription and to send you our weekly e-newsletter. We will not share this information with anyone.

  • Ad Space
    (320 x 53)
    Ad Space
    (300 x 250)


  • Ad Space
    (160 x 600)


  • Ad Space
    (160 x 600)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit & Advertising
    • Get Listed
    • We're Hiring
    • Subscribe
    • Subscriber Services
    • Site Map
    • Home
    • Art & Design
    • Books
    • Clubs
    • Comedy
    • Dance
    • Film
    • Gay & Lesbian
    • Home & Living
    • Kids
    • Museums & Culture
    • Music
    • Opera & Classical
    • Restaurants & Bars
    • Sex & Dating
    • Shopping
    • Spas & Gyms
    • Sports & Rec
    • Theater
    • Travel
    • TV
    • Visit our sister sites:
    • Time Out New York
    • Time Out New York Kids
    • Time Out London
    • Time Out Worldwide
    Copyright © 2000–2009 Time Out Chicago